Showing 1–7 of 7 results for “Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction”
20. Conversion total knee arthroplasty
cruciate ligament reconstruction performed in a university-affiliated hospital.10 Page 173For cTKA after ligament reconstruction, the biggest challenges are difficulty in exposure and the ability to obtain a balanced knee in light of ligamentous imbalances.11 Retained hardware from prior anterior
16. Patellofemoral arthritis in the female patient
anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury has also been shown to predispose patients to PF OA. Culvenar et al. performed a review in 2016 of the prevalence of PF symptoms after ACL reconstruction
14. Biomechanics of the female knee
reconstruction Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Orthop Traumatol 7, 2013;23: 747-752 doi:10.1007/s00590-012-1079-8. 36. Logterman SL, Wydra FB & Frank RM. Posterior cruciate ligament: anatomy and biomechanics Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 3, 2018;11: 510-514 doi:10.1007/s12178-018-9492-1. 37. Dasari SP, Kerzner B, Fortier LM, Gursoy
18. The female knee: Intraoperative considerations for the arthroplasty surgeon
cruciate ligament-retaining prosthesis. They found a significant sex difference, where males had a significantly increased risk for failure with cemented fixation compared with females (hazard ratio, 2.48; P =.004). Females demonstrated similar failure rates in both groups.69 With limited evidence of better longevity in a younger population, potentially easier
Index
cruciate ligament (ACL) anatomy, 121, 126–127 injury of, osteoarthritis and, 11 Anterior intercondylar fossa, 119 Anterior knee pain, 134 Anterior-based muscle-sparing approach (ABMS or Rottinger), 221, 224–225, 229t Anteroposterior stability, 126–127 Antibiotics for cemented total hip arthroplasty, 294 for conversion total hip arthroplasty
21. Revision knee replacement
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Surgeons should take this into consideration in the case of extensor mechanism incompetence.85 Revision of the patellar
17. Surgical indications for total knee arthroplasty
cruciate retaining [CR]) versus posterior stabilized ([PS] implants, cemented versus press-fit systems, patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing, robotic and/or computer navigated versus traditional alignment techniques, etc.) exist to improve this 20% dissatisfaction rate. However, that number has remained frustratingly intransigent over several decades. Many arthroplasty specialists now accept that proper
Also search PubMed
Search the National Library of Medicine for peer-reviewed articles